Disclaimer: This post might contain affiliate links. Using those links could result in me receiving a (financial) compensation from the advertised product or service. This is at no cost to you.
On this site I write about investing. Everything I write is my opinion. I don't give investment advice (nor financial advice in general). Always do your own research and make your own decisions.
Investing can be rewarding but it is not without risk. You can lose (a part of) your deposit.

Refinancing My Apartment to Lower Interest Payments

This week I finally did it. I signed on the dotted line, and promised the bank that I will pay them back a crapload of money. I have been busy refinancing my apartment.

After all the considerations, spreadsheets, and thinking I knew this is a good idea. When you see the official paperwork, and the amount you owe, it’s a different feeling. Suddenly it seems like a lot of money. However, I guess a lot of people wouldn’t consider the mortgage I took out as a high mortgage.

So what did I do? I refinanced my original mortgage on my apartment into a lower rate, essentially bringing the real interest towards zero, for the next 6 years. Next to lowering the rate on my current mortgage, I took out an additional loan to have money available for investments.



Including the actual money I took out, my total monthly interest payment went down! So basically the bank is paying me to give me money. That is one of the wonders of personal finance, sometimes you can engineer a situation like this. You can read all the details here.

Dutch Real Estate

So the Dutch real estate market is crazy hot as we speak. We’re nowhere near London or Paris levels yet, but the larger cities (Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague, Utrecht etc) are appreciating fast. After the financial crisis we had quite a few years where the market was depressed. From 2014-2015 on prices began rising but very slowly. In 2017 it seems the rocket was ignited, and (especially urban) real estate went to the moon.

In most areas of the country we are past the 2008 peak of the market. Some more rural areas are lagging behind. Even though the economy is booming, people are leaving the countryside to live and work in the cities.

My Apartment

I bought my apartment late 2015. In hindsight, that was a very good time to be buying. Really all it was was luck, but I have heard people say luck is when preparation meets opportunity.

The unit I bought is a beautiful 2 bedroom / 1 bathroom apartment close to the city center (7 minute bike ride) in one of the four largest cities. It was recently built in 2013 so everything was brand new when I moved in.

When I bought my apartment, it was possible to finance 103% of the purchase price of a home. Whether this is good financial practice or not, I did it to cover part of my closing costs. I got a loan for 1.90% before tax deductions so I figured I could better borrow more money instead of taking money out of investments to put a down payment on the apartment.

The crazy mortgage insurance like the US sees for high LTV (loan to value) mortgages don’t exist in The Netherlands. Banks require you to insure the mortgage against death, and only for the part over 80% LTV. I paid € 3.75 per month for this insurance, so no there was no problem there.

My Old Mortgage

Actually, I took out two mortgages when I purchased my apartment. The larger of the two was trough an online bank, where I financed the bulk of the purchase (about 96%) and the remaining 7% I financed through the local municipality. Here in The Netherlands some municipalities are actively targeting recent graduates to move to their city, so they give out these “starter loans” to help them finance a home.

The first three years the interest rate is 0%, and there is no amortisation. After three years, the interest rate is fixed for 15 years at a certain rate, and then a 30 year amortisation kicks in.

The rate on my first mortgage was 1.90% before tax deductions. The rate on the starter loan was 3.40% but I refinanced before it kicked in. Basically I borrowed money from the government for 2.5 years without paying any interest whatsoever.

I used to pay around 580 euros per month in principal and interest combined, of which the interest payment was slowly lowering every month but made up around 235 euros. This is excluding the starter loan. That would have been about 25 euros per month in interest after the third year.

Appreciation Baby!

So with all the crazy real estate going on around me, I noticed that my neighbours were selling their apartment. The floor plan was exactly the same as mine, only their kitchen and bathroom were a little more premium than mine. However, was stood out the most was their asking price. They wanted 220,000 euros for their place! I bought mine for about 160,000…

They sold within a week. Luckily, our government makes a lot of information related to real estate open to the public. For 2 euros you can get the actual price for which a house was sold from the government. Since I was already planning a refinance, I did this. The actual sales price was 245,000!

This appreciation made it possible for me to refinance into a lower rate and get some capital out.

The New Mortgage

The loan I took out for the refinance is for 187,500 euros. That keeps me slightly below 80% loan to value, meaning I get a super low interest rate of 1.40%.



My new mortgage consists of two parts. The first part is to pay off my existing loans, both the bank loan and the starter loan I got from the city. This first mortgage is for about 158,500 euros.

The second mortgage is the one that I actually take out to invest. That one is worth almost 29,000 euros. From this second mortgage the costs such as from the notary and the loan arrangement fee are paid, so I received a little less than 29k.

Part of the fees is tax deductible, so next year when the tax returns are coming I expect to receive back around 800-1000 euros.

Why This Was a Good Idea

So a lot of people will say taking out loans to have capital for investments is a bad idea. Generally I agree with them, but in this case I honestly believe this will work out pretty fine.

Be aware, the follow section contains a lot of numbers. Nerds will be happy.

Comparing Before and After

So when comparing the before and after scenarios, we would want to look at the interest I was paying on my original loans and the interest I’m paying on the new ones. If we compare those, we get the following result.

Straight Forward Calculation

AmountInterest RateYearly Interest
Current
149,8001.90%2,846
8,7003.40%296
158,5001.98%3,142
New
158,5001.40%2,219
29,0001.40%406
187,5001.40%2,625
Difference
29,000-1.78%-517

As you can see, when looking just at the raw interest rates, I’m actually getting paid by the bank for taking out additional capital.

Of course, the world is never as straight forward as this. We have to take into account tax deductions on the interest paid, as well as the net fees for refinancing. If we incorporate those, we get.

Detailed Calculation

AmountInterest RateYearly InterestRemarks
Current
149,8001.14%1,708Applied 40% deduction
8,7002.04%177Applied 40% deduction
158,5001.19%1,885
New
158,5000.85%1,1331Applied 40% deduction
29,0001.40%406No deduction on secondary mortgages
187,5000.93%1,737
Difference
29,000-0.51%-148Less profit but still the bank pays me while handing over money
Net interest saved over 6 years (fixed rate term)-888
Net refinance fees and costs1,200
Total net costs312
Net costs per year52
Yield on 27,8000.19%
Break even 2nd mortgage1.46%

That means that I have to make a very easy 0,2% interest on the money to brake even with my original mortgage after taking into account the tax deductible interest and the refinancing fees.

Break Even Calculations

Looking at the break-even point for the secondary mortgage, I’d have to invest and yield at least 1.46% to break even on the interest on the secondary mortgage. The interest on secondary mortgages, even if they are secured against your primary residence, are not deductible in The Netherlands so I have to make up for the full 1.40%.

Because there are costs involved in refinancing, I can only deploy 27,800 euros and have to cover 1.40% on 29,000. That is what causes the slightly higher figure of 1.46% (1.40% x 29,000 = 406, 406 / 27,800 = 1.46%).

Also this will be more than possible. Over the long term the stock market yields around 7% after inflation or 9% before inflation, so I don’t see any problems there. Of course, there’s always the sequence of returns risk but with these little interest payments I’m not really afraid.

Worst Case Scenario

The worst that can happen is that during a market crash both my stocks and apartment decline 40% in value. In that case I will simply have to stay put. Making the monthly payments will not be difficult, but for example moving would be a little bit harder. Anyway, I will still have my emergency fund in case things go south.

Conclusion

With the money in the bank as of last week, everything I wrote about on Ontsladebaas.nl about this topic is now finished. The money will be deployed according to my regular investment strategy. Of the total sum I will keep on half in cash, and invest the other half in the world economy through VWRL and IUSN.

 

Do you consider refinancing your property too? What are your thoughts? Please let me know in the comments below.

19 thoughts on “Refinancing My Apartment to Lower Interest Payments”

    • Let the banks make their profits. I’m happy with them earning a lot of money if it earns me as well.

      So the mortgage is a 6 year term via Lloyds Bank (previously known as Bank of Scotland) at <80% loan to value. <90% would be 1,45%. A 10 year term is 1,95% if I recall correctly.

      I don’t plan on living here for another 10 years, so the 6 year term makes sense. I’ll either sell or rent out the apartment. When renting out I have to refinance into a different mortgage anyways.

      Reply
  1. Hallo B.,

    Bedankt voor je blog! Erg leerzaam!
    Mag ik jou een paar vragen stellen over het herfinancieren van je woning?

    Zelf ben ik met dezelfde dingen bezig (financiele zelfstandigheid, investeren, etc.) en mijn appartement is fors meer waard dan de hypotheek.

    Hoe jij dat heb geregeld qua extra financiering (met lage rente) is een elegante stap.

    Ok, een paar vragen die ik heb:
    – Ben je overgestapt qua hypotheekverstrekker?
    – Welke stappen moest je doorlopen? Net als bij een gewone hypotheek? Bijvoorbeeld een taxatierapport laten maken, hypotheekadviseur in de hand nemen?
    – Hoe moest je aantonen dat de waarde was gestegen. Misschien met een taxatierapport, maar ik kan me voorstellen dat de WOZ-waarde maar langzaam meestijgt. Dat ‘drukt’ misschien de taxatiewaarde.

    Ik probeer dus gevoel te krijgen of dit haalbaar is in mijn geval en waar ik tegen aan ga lopen.

    Alvast ontzettend dank voor je reactie!

    Reply
    • Hi Niels, wat leuk dat je reageert en zelf ook druk bent met je geldzaken!
      Allereerst wil ik zeggen dat wat ik heb gedaan niet voor iedereen is weggelegd. Het verhogen van je hypotheek is zeker niet in alle gevallen een goed idee. Wat ik in dit artikel heb beschreven is dus puur mijn eigen ervaring, en géén financieel advies. Dat geef ik niet.

      Wat betreft jouw vragen:
      – Ik ben inderdaad overgestapt. Mijn hypotheekverstrekker wilde niet meewerken, dus ben naar een andere gegaan. Uiteindelijk bleek dat ook veel goedkoper te zijn (1.4% t.o.v. 1.9%).
      – Omdat ik ben overgestapt naar een andere verstrekker inderdaad dezelfde stappen doorlopen. Ik heb geen adviseur in de hand genomen. Er zijn een aantal aanbieders die execution-only voor jou bemiddelen met een hypotheekverstrekker en sommige banken bieden dit zelf ook aan.
      – De waardestijging hoefde ik niet aan te tonen. Ik vroeg een hypotheek aan voor het bedrag dat in het artikel staat, en moest hoe dan ook een taxatie laten uitvoeren. Deze wees uit dat de hypotheek <80% LTV zou zijn.

      Of het haalbaar is ligt aan je financiën. Of het slim is om te doen ligt aan je eigen gevoel. Als je slecht slaapt bij het nemen van risico's zou ik afraden dit door te zetten. Doe alsjeblieft goed je eigen onderzoek voor je dit doet.

      Succes,
      B

      Reply
      • Ik neem aan dat je rentevasteperiode voorbij was en je dus de hypotheek hebt overgesloten? Zelf zit ik bij hypotrust en die rekenen bij vroegtijdig oversluiten een belachelijk hoge boete van 27.000 euro in mijn geval. De oplossing is het huis verkopen en ergens anders gaan wonen. Dan kan je wel een nieuwe hypotheek afsluiten met lagere rente (alhoewel je natuurlijk ook kosten gaat hebben).

        Reply
        • De boete is afhankelijk van onder andere de resterende looptijd en het renteverschil. Dat renteverschil was bij mij niet zo groot en resulteerde dus in een kleine boete (ongeveer 2000 euro voor belastingvoordeel dus zo’n 1000 euro netto). Dit was in mijn situatie de moeite waard. Dit betekent niet dat dat in elke situatie de moeite is zoals jouw 27k laat zien.

          Reply
  2. Hi B,

    Great tip, thanks a lot. May I ask how you get
    ‘For 2 euros you can get the actual price for which a house was sold from the government’ information?

    thanks in advance

    Reply
    • Sure, through “Kadaster” you can download data like this (current owner, last transaction date, transaction price) etc. The costs were 2.40 EUR (not sure if that’s still the same).
      Mind you: sometimes the information is not complete.

      Reply
  3. Nice article! I do have one question, though. Your loan was under the limit for Dutch “NHG”, but still you could get a lower interest rate. Normally I think you can only get a lower interest rate by decreasing your LTV if you don’t have NHG.

    Did your mortgage not have NHG?

    Reply
    • My original mortgage did have NHG, because that was the lowest interest I could get back then. There are some strings attached to the NHG when refinancing. Plus, you’d have to make a new contribution to the fund. Those things combined made me not do it. The difference in interest was also quite low (1.20% vs 1.40%).

      Reply
  4. Nice article B. Although I am sceptical at using mortgage debt for investme ts, it is interesting at current rates.
    How did your bank allow you to increase your mortgage to subtract money from it? Normally there should be an reference (onderpand) and not for consumptional use.

    Reply
    • It’s in the article I think. I got a new mortgage at (then) 78% LTV which happened to be almost 30k above my current mortgage. So there was more than enough property value to sustain the mortgage.

      Reply
  5. Hoi B

    ik luister al een tijdje naar jullie podcasts
    ik heb interesse om te gaan investeren in etf’s
    maar het is mij niet helemaal duidelijk of ik met mijn belegging
    ook kan gebruiken als eigen vermogen om een hogere hypotheek te krijgen
    omdat dit geld dus belegt is en ik het niet op de spaarrekening heb staan
    ik hoor graag hoe dit in zijn werking gaat
    alvast bedankt

    Reply
    • Hi Mar, je kan in de regel geen vermogen gebruiken om een hogere hypotheek te krijgen. Voor de maximale hypotheek telt alleen je inkomen en de waarde van het huis dat je koopt mee.

      Als je een duurder huis wil kopen dan dat je hypotheek kan krijgen moet je het verschil zelf bijleggen. Of je dit nou doet met geld van een spaarrekening of van een beleggingsrekening maakt natuurlijk niet uit.

      Wel is het zo dat beleggingen risico met zich meebrengen. Als je op korte termijn een woning wil kopen kan het dus gebeuren dat je belegging minder waard wordt.

      Dit is geen financieel advies. Je bent altijd zelf verantwoordelijk voor de keuzes die je maakt.

      Reply

Leave a comment